Paper detail

Likelihood analysis of the flavour anomalies and $g-2$ in the general two Higgs doublet model

We present a likelihood analysis of the general two Higgs doublet model, using the most important currently measured flavour observables, in view of the anomalies in charged current tree-level and neutral current one-loop rare decays of $B$ mesons in $b\to c l \overlineν$ and $b\to sμ^{+}μ^{-}$ transitions, respectively. We corroborate that the model explains the latter and it is able to simultaneously fit the experimental values of the $R(D)$ ratio at $1σ$, but it can not accommodate the $R(D^{*})$ and $F_{L}(D^{*})$ observables. We find that the fitted values for the angular observables in $b\to sμ^{+}μ^{-}$ transitions exhibit better agreement with the general two Higgs double model in comparison to the SM. We also make predictions for future collider observables $\mathrm{BR}(t\to ch)$, $\mathrm{BR}(h\to bs)$, $\mathrm{BR}(h\to τμ)$, $\mathrm{BR}(B_{s}\rightarrowτ^{+}τ^{-})$, $\mathrm{BR}(B^{+}\rightarrow K^{+}τ^{+}τ^{-})$ and the flavour violating decays of the $τ$ lepton, $\mathrm{BR}(τ\rightarrow3μ)$ and $\mathrm{BR}(τ\toμγ)$. The model predicts values of $\mathrm{BR}(t\to ch)$, $\mathrm{BR}(B_{s}\rightarrowτ^{+}τ^{-})$ and $\mathrm{BR}(B^{+}\rightarrow K^{+}τ^{+}τ^{-})$ that are out of reach of future experiments, but its predictions for $\mathrm{BR}(h\to bs)$ and $\mathrm{BR}(h\to τμ)$ are within the future sensitivity of the HL-LHC or the ILC. We also find that the predictions for the $τ\rightarrow3μ$ and $τ\toμγ$ decays are well within the projected limits of the Belle II experiment. Finally, using the latest measurement of the Fermilab Muon $g-2$ Collaboration, we performed a simultaneous fit to $Δa_μ$ constrained by the charged anomalies, finding solutions at the $1σ$ level. Once the neutral anomalies are included, however, a simultaneous explanation is unfeasible.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.