Paper detail

Light scalar mesons and charmless hadronic $B_c \to SP, SV$ decays in the perturbative QCD approach

In this work, based on the assumption of two-quark structure of the scalars, the charmless hadronic $B_c \to SP, SV$ decays(here, $S$, $P$, and $V$ denote the light scalar, pseudoscalar, and vector mesons, respectively) are investigated by employing the perturbative QCD(pQCD) factorization approach.From our numerical evaluations and phenomenological analysis, we find that (a) the pQCD predictions for the {\it CP}-averaged branching ratios(BRs) of the considered $B_c$ decays vary in the range of $10^{-5}$ to $10^{-8}$, which will be tested in the ongoing LHCb and forthcoming Super-B experiments, while the {\it CP}-violating asymmetries for these modes are absent naturally in the standard model because only one type tree operator is involved; %% (b) analogous to $B \to K^* η^{(\prime)}$ decays, $Br(B_c \to κ^+ η) \sim 5 \times Br(B_c \to κ^+ η^\prime)$ in the pQCD approach, which can be understood by the constructive and destructive interference between the $η_q$ and $η_s$ contributions to the $B_c \to κ^+ η$ and $B_c \to κ^+ η^\prime$ decays, however, $Br(B_c \to K_0^*(1430) η)$ is approximately equal to $Br(B_c \to K_0^*(1430) η')$ in both scenarios because the factorizable contributions from $η_s$ term play the dominant role in the considered two channels; %% (c) if $a_0(980)$ and $κ$ are the $q\bar q$ bound states, the pQCD predicted BRs for $B_c \to a_0(980) (π, ρ)$ and $B_c \to κK^{(*)}$ decays will be in the range of $10^{-6} \sim 10^{-5}$, which are within the reach of the LHCb experiments and could be measured in the near future; and %% (d) for the $a_0(1450)$ and $K_0^*(1430)$ channels, the BRs for $B_c \to a_0(1450) (π, ρ)$ and $B_c \to K_0^*(1430) K^{(*)}$ modes in the pQCD approach are found to be $(5 \sim 47) \times 10^{-6}$ and $(0.7 \sim 36) \times 10^{-6}$, respectively.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.