Light scalar mesons and charmless hadronic Bc→SP,SVB_c \to SP, SV decays in the perturbative QCD approach

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Abstract

In this work, based on the assumption of two-quark structure of the scalars, the charmless hadronic Bc→SP,SVB_c \to SP, SV decays(here, SS, PP, and VV denote the light scalar, pseudoscalar, and vector mesons, respectively) are investigated by employing the perturbative QCD(pQCD) factorization approach.From our numerical evaluations and phenomenological analysis, we find that (a) the pQCD predictions for the {\it CP}-averaged branching ratios(BRs) of the considered BcB_c decays vary in the range of 10−510^{-5} to 10−810^{-8}, which will be tested in the ongoing LHCb and forthcoming Super-B experiments, while the {\it CP}-violating asymmetries for these modes are absent naturally in the standard model because only one type tree operator is involved; %% (b) analogous to B→K∗η(′)B \to K^* η^{(\prime)} decays, Br(Bc→κ+η)∼5×Br(Bc→κ+η′)Br(B_c \to κ^+ η) \sim 5 \times Br(B_c \to κ^+ η^\prime) in the pQCD approach, which can be understood by the constructive and destructive interference between the ηqη_q and ηsη_s contributions to the Bc→κ+ηB_c \to κ^+ η and Bc→κ+η′B_c \to κ^+ η^\prime decays, however, Br(Bc→K0∗(1430)η)Br(B_c \to K_0^*(1430) η) is approximately equal to Br(Bc→K0∗(1430)η′)Br(B_c \to K_0^*(1430) η') in both scenarios because the factorizable contributions from ηsη_s term play the dominant role in the considered two channels; %% (c) if a0(980)a_0(980) and κκ are the qqˉq\bar q bound states, the pQCD predicted BRs for Bc→a0(980)(π,ρ)B_c \to a_0(980) (π, ρ) and Bc→κK(∗)B_c \to κK^{(*)} decays will be in the range of 10−6∼10−510^{-6} \sim 10^{-5}, which are within the reach of the LHCb experiments and could be measured in the near future; and %% (d) for the a0(1450)a_0(1450) and K0∗(1430)K_0^*(1430) channels, the BRs for Bc→a0(1450)(π,ρ)B_c \to a_0(1450) (π, ρ) and Bc→K0∗(1430)K(∗)B_c \to K_0^*(1430) K^{(*)} modes in the pQCD approach are found to be (5∼47)×10−6(5 \sim 47) \times 10^{-6} and (0.7∼36)×10−6(0.7 \sim 36) \times 10^{-6}, respectively.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.