Paper detail

Light Deflection under the Gravitational Field of Jupiter -- Testing General Relativity

We measured the relative positions between two pairs of compact extragalactic sources (CESs), J1925-2219 \& J1923-2104 (C1--C2) and J1925-2219 \& J1928-2035 (C1--C3) on 2020 October 23--25 and 2021 February 5 (totaling four epochs), respectively, using the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA) at 15 GHz. Accounting for the deflection angle dominated by Jupiter, as well as the contributions from the Sun, planets other than Earth, the Moon and Ganymede (the most massive of the solar system's moons), our theoretical calculations predict that the dynamical ranges of the relative positions across four epochs in R.A. of the C1--C2 pair and C1--C3 pair are 841.2 and 1127.9 $μ$as, respectively. The formal accuracy in R.A. is about 20 $μ$as, but the error in Decl. is poor. The measured standard deviations of the relative positions across the four epochs are 51.0 and 29.7 $μ$as in R.A. for C1--C2 and C1--C3, respectively. These values indicate that the accuracy of the post-Newtonian relativistic parameter, $γ$, is $\sim 0.061$ for C1--C2 and $\sim 0.026$ for C1--C3. Combining the two CES pairs, the measured value of $γ$ is $0.984 \pm 0.037$, which is comparable to the latest published results for Jupiter as a gravitational lens reported by Fomalont \& Kopeikin, i.e., $1.01 \pm 0.03$.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.