Paper detail

LHC signatures of neutrino mass generation through R-parity violation

We consider a model of neutrino mass based on R-parity violating (RPV) supersymmetry, with three $μ_i$, relevant for bilinear RPV terms, and three $λ'_{ijk}$, relevant for the trilinear terms. The present neutrino data, after a precise determination of the mixing angle $θ_{13}$, severely constrain such models. We make a thorough study of one such class of models that may have interesting signatures at the upgraded LHC. In this class of models, the relevant trilinear couplings are of the form $λ'_{i33}$, so if the lighter stop squark $\tilde{t}_1$ is the lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP), it will decay only through these couplings, giving rise to events with isolated hard leptons and jets. Even when $\tilde{t}_1$ is the next-to-LSP (NLSP), it can decay via the tiny $λ'$ couplings allowed by the neutrino data, although it may face stiff competition from some R-parity conserving decay modes. Using a simple Pythia based simulation, we find that in both the cases the signal consisting of a pair of oppositely charged leptons ($ee$, $μμ$ or $e μ$) plus jets may be observable at the upgraded LHC experiments for a reasonable range of the $\tilde{t}_1$ mass.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.