Paper detail

Leveraging Causal Inference for Explainable Automatic Program Repair

Deep learning models have made significant progress in automatic program repair. However, the black-box nature of these methods has restricted their practical applications. To address this challenge, this paper presents an interpretable approach for program repair based on sequence-to-sequence models with causal inference and our method is called CPR, short for causal program repair. Our CPR can generate explanations in the process of decision making, which consists of groups of causally related input-output tokens. Firstly, our method infers these relations by querying the model with inputs disturbed by data augmentation. Secondly, it generates a graph over tokens from the responses and solves a partitioning problem to select the most relevant components. The experiments on four programming languages (Java, C, Python, and JavaScript) show that CPR can generate causal graphs for reasonable interpretations and boost the performance of bug fixing in automatic program repair.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.