Paper detail

Left-handed Z' and Z FCNC quark couplings facing new b -> s mu^+ mu^- data

In view of the recent improved data on B_{s,d}->mu^+ mu^- and B_d->K^*mu^+mu^- we revisit two simple NP scenarios in which new FCNC currents in b->s mu^+ mu^- transitions are mediated either entirely by a neutral heavy gauge boson Z' with purely LH complex couplings Delta_L^{qb}(Z') (q=d,s) and couplings to muons Delta_A^{mu mu}(Z') and Delta_V^{mu mu}(Z') or the SM Z boson with LH complex couplings Delta_L^{qb}(Z). We demonstrate how these couplings can be determined by future Delta F=2 and b->s mu^+ mu^- observables. The correlations between various observables can test these NP scenarios. We present the results as functions of Delta M_q/Delta M_q^SM, S_{psi phi} and S_{psi K_S} which should be precisely determined in this decade. We calculate the violation of the CMFV relation between BR(B_{s,d}-> mu^+ mu^-) and Delta M_{s,d} in these scenarios. We find that the data on B_{s,d}->mu^+ mu^- from CMS and LHCb can be reproduced in both scenarios but in the case of Z, Delta M_s and S_{psi phi} have to be very close to their SM values. As far as B_d->K^*mu^+mu^- anomalies are concerned the Z' scenario can significantly soften these anomalies while the Z boson fails because of the small vector coupling to muons. We also point out that recent proposals of explaining these anomalies with the help of a real Wilson coefficient C^NP_9 implies uniquely an enhancement of Delta M_s with respect to its SM value, while a complex C^NP_9 allows for both enhancement and suppression of Delta M_s and simultaneously novel CP-violating effects. We also discuss briefly scenarios in which the Z' boson has RH FCNC couplings. In this context we point out a number of correlations between angular observables measured in B_d->K^*mu^+ mu^- that arise in the absence of new CP-violating phases in scenarios with only LH or RH couplings or scenarios in which LH and RH couplings are equal to each other or differ by sign.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.