Paper detail

Lefschetz thimbles decomposition for the Hubbard model on the hexagonal lattice

We propose a framework to study the properties of the Lefschetz thimbles decomposition for lattice fermion models approaching the thermodynamic limit. The proposed set of algorithms includes the Schur complement solver and the exact computation of the derivatives of the fermion determinant. It allows us to solve the gradient flow (GF) equations taking into account the fermion determinant exactly, with high performance. We can find both real and complex saddle points and describe the structure of the Lefschetz thimbles decomposition for large enough lattices to extrapolate the results to the thermodynamic limit. The algorithms are described for a general lattice fermion model, with emphasis on two types of lattice discretizations for relativistic fermions (staggered and Wilson), as well as on interacting tight-binding models for condensed matter systems. We apply these algorithms to the Hubbard model on a hexagonal lattice, dealing with lattice volumes as large as 12x12 with 256 steps in Euclidean time, in order to capture the properties of the thimbles decomposition as the thermodynamic, low-temperature, and continuum limits are approached. The complexity of the thimbles decomposition appears to be dependent on the form of the Hubbard-Stratonovich (HS) transformation. In particular, the evidence is provided for the existence of an optimal regime for the hexagonal lattice Hubbard model, with a reduced number of thimbles being important in the overall sum. We have performed quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) simulations using GF to deform the integration contour into the complex plane and demonstrated the agreement with exact diagonalization on small volumes (8 sites in space) if optimal setup for HS transformation is used. The residual sign problem is compared with the state-of-the-art BSS-QMC. We show that the average sign can be kept substantially higher using the Lefschetz thimbles approach.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.