Paper detail

Learning XML Twig Queries

We investigate the problem of learning XML queries, path queries and tree pattern queries, from examples given by the user. A learning algorithm takes on the input a set of XML documents with nodes annotated by the user and returns a query that selects the nodes in a manner consistent with the annotation. We study two learning settings that differ with the types of annotations. In the first setting the user may only indicate required nodes that the query must return. In the second, more general, setting, the user may also indicate forbidden nodes that the query must not return. The query may or may not return any node with no annotation. We formalize what it means for a class of queries to be \emph{learnable}. One requirement is the existence of a learning algorithm that is sound i.e., always returns a query consistent with the examples given by the user. Furthermore, the learning algorithm should be complete i.e., able to produce every query with a sufficiently rich example. Other requirements involve tractability of learning and its robustness to nonessential examples. We show that the classes of simple path queries and path-subsumption-free tree queries are learnable from positive examples. The learnability of the full class of tree pattern queries (and the full class of path queries) remains an open question. We show also that adding negative examples to the picture renders the learning unfeasible. Published in ICDT 2012, Berlin.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.