Paper detail

Learning to segment prostate cancer by aggressiveness from scribbles in bi-parametric MRI

In this work, we propose a deep U-Net based model to tackle the challenging task of prostate cancer segmentation by aggressiveness in MRI based on weak scribble annotations. This model extends the size constraint loss proposed by Kervadec et al. 1 in the context of multiclass detection and segmentation task. This model is of high clinical interest as it allows training on prostate biopsy samples and avoids time-consuming full annotation process. Performance is assessed on a private dataset (219 patients) where the full ground truth is available as well as on the ProstateX-2 challenge database, where only biopsy results at different localisations serve as reference. We show that we can approach the fully-supervised baseline in grading the lesions by using only 6.35% of voxels for training. We report a lesion-wise Cohen's kappa score of 0.29 $\pm$ 0.07 for the weak model versus 0.32 $\pm$ 0.05 for the baseline. We also report a kappa score (0.276 $\pm$ 0.037) on the ProstateX-2 challenge dataset with our weak U-Net trained on a combination of ProstateX-2 and our dataset, which is the highest reported value on this challenge dataset for a segmentation task to our knowledge.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.