Paper detail

Learning Speaker Embedding with Momentum Contrast

Speaker verification can be formulated as a representation learning task, where speaker-discriminative embeddings are extracted from utterances of variable lengths. Momentum Contrast (MoCo) is a recently proposed unsupervised representation learning framework, and has shown its effectiveness for learning good feature representation for downstream vision tasks. In this work, we apply MoCo to learn speaker embedding from speech segments. We explore MoCo for both unsupervised learning and pretraining settings. In the unsupervised scenario, embedding is learned by MoCo from audio data without using any speaker specific information. On a large scale dataset with $2,500$ speakers, MoCo can achieve EER $4.275\%$ trained unsupervisedly, and the EER can decrease further to $3.58\%$ if extra unlabelled data are used. In the pretraining scenario, encoder trained by MoCo is used to initialize the downstream supervised training. With finetuning on the MoCo trained model, the equal error rate (EER) reduces $13.7\%$ relative ($1.44\%$ to $1.242\%$) compared to a carefully tuned baseline training from scratch. Comparative study confirms the effectiveness of MoCo learning good speaker embedding.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.