Paper detail

Learning rates of $l^q$ coefficient regularization learning with Gaussian kernel

Regularization is a well recognized powerful strategy to improve the performance of a learning machine and $l^q$ regularization schemes with $0<q<\infty$ are central in use. It is known that different $q$ leads to different properties of the deduced estimators, say, $l^2$ regularization leads to smooth estimators while $l^1$ regularization leads to sparse estimators. Then, how does the generalization capabilities of $l^q$ regularization learning vary with $q$? In this paper, we study this problem in the framework of statistical learning theory and show that implementing $l^q$ coefficient regularization schemes in the sample dependent hypothesis space associated with Gaussian kernel can attain the same almost optimal learning rates for all $0<q<\infty$. That is, the upper and lower bounds of learning rates for $l^q$ regularization learning are asymptotically identical for all $0<q<\infty$. Our finding tentatively reveals that, in some modeling contexts, the choice of $q$ might not have a strong impact with respect to the generalization capability. From this perspective, $q$ can be arbitrarily specified, or specified merely by other no generalization criteria like smoothness, computational complexity, sparsity, etc..

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.