Paper detail

Learning Mappings between Equilibrium States of Liquid Systems Using Normalizing Flows

Generative models are a promising tool to address the sampling problem in multi-body and condensed-matter systems in the framework of statistical mechanics. In this work, we show that normalizing flows can be used to learn a transformation to map different liquid systems into each other allowing at the same time to obtain an unbiased equilibrium distribution through a reweighting process. Two proof-of-principles calculations are presented for the transformation between Lennard-Jones systems of particles with different depths of the potential well and for the transformation between a Lennard-Jones and a system of repulsive particles. In both numerical experiments, systems are in the liquid state. In future applications, this approach could lead to efficient methods to simulate liquid systems at ab-initio accuracy with the computational cost of less accurate models, such as force field or coarse-grained simulations.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.