Paper detail

Learning Geometric Constraints in Task and Motion Planning

Searching for bindings of geometric parameters in task and motion planning (TAMP) is a finite-horizon stochastic planning problem with high-dimensional decision spaces. A robot manipulator can only move in a subspace of its whole range that is subjected to many geometric constraints. A TAMP solver usually takes many explorations before finding a feasible binding set for each task. It is favorable to learn those constraints once and then transfer them over different tasks within the same workspace. We address this problem by representing constraint knowledge with transferable primitives and using Bayesian optimization (BO) based on these primitives to guide binding search in further tasks. Via semantic and geometric backtracking in TAMP, we construct constraint primitives to encode the geometric constraints respectively in a reusable form. Then we devise a BO approach to efficiently utilize the accumulated constraints for guiding node expansion of an MCTS-based binding planner. We further compose a transfer mechanism to enable free knowledge flow between TAMP tasks. Results indicate that our approach reduces the expensive exploration calls in binding search by 43.60to 71.69 when compared to the baseline unguided planner.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.