Paper detail

Learning from Label Relationships in Human Affect

Human affect and mental state estimation in an automated manner, face a number of difficulties, including learning from labels with poor or no temporal resolution, learning from few datasets with little data (often due to confidentiality constraints) and, (very) long, in-the-wild videos. For these reasons, deep learning methodologies tend to overfit, that is, arrive at latent representations with poor generalisation performance on the final regression task. To overcome this, in this work, we introduce two complementary contributions. First, we introduce a novel relational loss for multilabel regression and ordinal problems that regularises learning and leads to better generalisation. The proposed loss uses label vector inter-relational information to learn better latent representations by aligning batch label distances to the distances in the latent feature space. Second, we utilise a two-stage attention architecture that estimates a target for each clip by using features from the neighbouring clips as temporal context. We evaluate the proposed methodology on both continuous affect and schizophrenia severity estimation problems, as there are methodological and contextual parallels between the two. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed methodology outperforms all baselines. In the domain of schizophrenia, the proposed methodology outperforms previous state-of-the-art by a large margin, achieving a PCC of up to 78% performance close to that of human experts (85%) and much higher than previous works (uplift of up to 40%). In the case of affect recognition, we outperform previous vision-based methods in terms of CCC on both the OMG and the AMIGOS datasets. Specifically for AMIGOS, we outperform previous SoTA CCC for both arousal and valence by 9% and 13% respectively, and in the OMG dataset we outperform previous vision works by up to 5% for both arousal and valence.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.