Paper detail

Lazy State Determination: More concurrency for contending linearizable transactions

The concurrency control algorithms in transactional systems limits concurrency to provide strong semantics, which leads to poor performance under high contention. As a consequence, many transactional systems eschew strong semantics to achieve acceptable performance. We show that by leveraging semantic information associated with the transactional programs to increase concurrency, it is possible to significantly improve performance while maintaining linearizability. To this end, we introduce the lazy state determination API to easily expose the semantics of application transactions to the database, and propose new optimistic and pessimistic concurrency control algorithms that leverage this information to safely increase concurrency in the presence of contention. Our evaluation shows that our approach can achieve up to 5x more throughput with 1.5c less latency than standard techniques in the popular TPC-C benchmark.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.