Paper detail

Lattice cohomology and rational cuspidal curves

We show a counterexample to a conjecture of de Bobadilla, Luengo, Melle-Hernández and Némethi on rational cuspidal projective plane curves. The counterexample is a tricuspidal curve of degree 8. On the other hand, we show that if the number of cusps is at most 2, then the original conjecture can be deduced from the recent results of Borodzik and Livingston and (lattice cohomology) computations of Némethi and Román. Then we formulate a `simplified' (slightly weaker) version, more in the spirit of the motivation of the original conjecture (comparing index type numerical invariants), and we prove it for all currently known rational cuspidal curves. We make all these identities and inequalities more transparent in the language of lattice cohomology of surgery 3-manifolds $S^3_{-d}(K)$, where $K$ is a connected sum of algebraic knots $\{K_i\}_i$. Finally, we prove that the zeroth lattice cohomology of this surgery manifold depends only on the multiset of multiplicities occurring in the multiplicity sequences describing the algebraic knots $K_i$. This result is closely related to the lattice-cohomological reformulation of the above mentioned theorems and conjectures, and provides new computational and comparison procedures.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.