Paper detail

Late states of incompressible 2D decaying vorticity fields

Two-dimensional decaying turbulent flow is known to approach apparently stable states after a long time evolution. A few theories and models have been so far proposed to account for this relaxation. In this paper, we compare results of numerical experiments with the predictions of these theories to assess their applicability. We study the long time decay of initially multilevel vorticity fields on the periodic box, and characterize the outcoming final states. Our final states do not match the predictions of the theories; a broader variety of dipole profiles, as well as nonstationary final states are found. The problem of the robustness of the relaxational state with respect to variations of the Reynolds number and different numerical resolution is addressed. The observed configurations also do not necessarily possess the maximal energy, in contrast to what is anticipated by some of the theories. We are led to conclude that the mixing of the vorticity is generally not ergodic, and that some metastable configurations may inhibit the attainment of an equilibrium state.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.