Paper detail

Larger Scale Offers Better Security in the Nakamoto-style Blockchain

Traditional security models for Nakamoto-style blockchains assume instantaneous synchronization among malicious nodes, which overestimate adversarial coordination capability. We revisit these existing models and propose two more realistic security models. First, we propose the static delay model. This model first incorporates adversarial communication delay. It quantifies how the delay constrains the effective growth rate of private chains and yields a closed-form expression for the security threshold. Second, we propose the dynamic delay model that further captures the decay of adversarial corruption capability and the total adversarial delay window. Theoretical analysis shows that private attacks remain optimal under both models. Finally, we prove that large-scale Nakamoto-style blockchains offer better security. This result provided a theoretical foundation for optimizing consensus protocols and assessing the robustness of large-scale blockchains.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.