Paper detail

Large Thermoelectric Power Factor in One-Dimensional Telluride Nb4SiTe4 and Substituted Compounds

We found that whisker crystals of Mo-doped Nb4SiTe4 show high thermoelectric performances at low temperatures, indicated by the largest power factor of 70 microW cm-1 K-2 at 230-300 K, much larger than those of Bi2Te3-based practical materials. This power factor is smaller than the maximum value in the 5d analogue Ta4SiTe4, but is comparable to that with a similar doping level. First principles calculation results suggest that the difference in thermoelectric performances between Nb and Ta compounds is caused by the much smaller band gap in Nb4SiTe4 than that in Ta4SiTe4, due to the weaker spin-orbit coupling in the former. We also demonstrated that the solid solution of Nb4SiTe4 and Ta4SiTe4 shows a large power factor, indicating that their combination is promising as a practical thermoelectric material, as in the case of Bi2Te3 and Sb2Te3. These results advance our understanding of the mechanism of high thermoelectric performances in this one-dimensional telluride system, as well as indicating the high potential of this system as a practical thermoelectric material for low temperature applications.

preprint2018arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.