Paper detail

Large $t\to cZ$ as a Sign of Vector-Like Quarks in Light of the $W$ Mass

The rare flavour changing top quark decay $t\to cZ$ is a clear sign of new physics and experimentally very interesting due to the huge number of top quarks produced at the LHC. However, there are few (viable) models which can generate a sizable branching ratio for $t\to cZ$ -- in fact vector-like quarks seem to be the only realistic option. In this paper, we investigate all three representations (under the Standard Model gauge group) of vector-like quarks ($U$, $Q_1$ and $Q_7$) that can generate a sizable branching ratio for $t\to cZ$ without violating bounds from $B$ physics. Importantly, these are exactly the three vector-like quarks which can lead to a sizable positive shift in the prediction for $W$ mass, via the couplings to the top quark also needed for a sizable Br($t\to cZ$). Calculating and using the one-loop matching of vector-like quarks on the Standard Model Effective Field Theory, we find that Br($t\to cZ$) can be of the order of $10^{-6}$, $10^{-5}$ and $10^{-4}$ for $U$, $Q_1$ and $Q_7$, respectively and that in all three cases the large $W$ mass measurement can be accommodated.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.