Paper detail

Large-Scale Shill Bidder Detection in E-commerce

User feedback is one of the most effective methods to build and maintain trust in electronic commerce platforms. Unfortunately, dishonest sellers often bend over backward to manipulate users' feedback or place phony bids in order to increase their own sales and harm competitors. The black market of user feedback, supported by a plethora of shill bidders, prospers on top of legitimate electronic commerce. In this paper, we investigate the ecosystem of shill bidders based on large-scale data by analyzing hundreds of millions of users who performed billions of transactions, and we propose a machine-learning-based method for identifying communities of users that methodically provide dishonest feedback. Our results show that (1) shill bidders can be identified with high precision based on their transaction and feedback statistics; and (2) in contrast to legitimate buyers and sellers, shill bidders form cliques to support each other.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.