Paper detail

Large Dimensional Analysis and Improvement of Multi Task Learning

Multi Task Learning (MTL) efficiently leverages useful information contained in multiple related tasks to help improve the generalization performance of all tasks. This article conducts a large dimensional analysis of a simple but, as we shall see, extremely powerful when carefully tuned, Least Square Support Vector Machine (LSSVM) version of MTL, in the regime where the dimension $p$ of the data and their number $n$ grow large at the same rate. Under mild assumptions on the input data, the theoretical analysis of the MTL-LSSVM algorithm first reveals the "sufficient statistics" exploited by the algorithm and their interaction at work. These results demonstrate, as a striking consequence, that the standard approach to MTL-LSSVM is largely suboptimal, can lead to severe effects of negative transfer but that these impairments are easily corrected. These corrections are turned into an improved MTL-LSSVM algorithm which can only benefit from additional data, and the theoretical performance of which is also analyzed. As evidenced and theoretically sustained in numerous recent works, these large dimensional results are robust to broad ranges of data distributions, which our present experiments corroborate. Specifically, the article reports a systematically close behavior between theoretical and empirical performances on popular datasets, which is strongly suggestive of the applicability of the proposed carefully tuned MTL-LSSVM method to real data. This fine-tuning is fully based on the theoretical analysis and does not in particular require any cross validation procedure. Besides, the reported performances on real datasets almost systematically outperform much more elaborate and less intuitive state-of-the-art multi-task and transfer learning methods.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.