Paper detail

Lambda-Lambda interaction from relativistic heavy-ion collisions

We investigate the two-particle intensity correlation function of $Λ$ in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. We find that the behavior of the $ΛΛ$ correlation function at small relative momenta is fairly sensitive to the interaction potential and collective flows. By comparing the results of different source functions and potentials, we explore the effect of intrinsic collective motions on the correlation function. We find that the recent STAR data gives a strong constraint on the scattering length and effective range of $ΛΛ$ interaction as, $-1.8 \mathrm{fm}^{-1} < 1/a_0 < -0.8 \mathrm{fm}^{-1}$ and $3.5 \mathrm{fm} < r_\mathrm{eff} < 7 \mathrm{fm}$, respectively,if $Λ$ samples do not include feed-down contribution from long-lived particles. We find that feed-down correction for $Σ^0$ decay reduces the sensitivity of the correlation function to the detail of the $ΛΛ$ interaction. As a result, we obtain a weaker constraint $1/a_0 <-0.8$ fm$^{-1}$. Implication for the signal of existence of $H$-dibaryon is discussed. Comparison with the scattering parameters obtained from the double $Λ$ hypernucleus may reveal in-medium effects in the $ΛΛ$ interaction.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.