L1L_1-uniqueness of degenerate elliptic operators

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Abstract

Let ΩΩ be an open subset of $\Ri^d$ with 0∈Ω0\in Ω. Further let HΩ=−∑i,j=1d∂i cij ∂jH_Ω=-\sum^d_{i,j=1}\partial_i\,c_{ij}\,\partial_j be a second-order partial differential operator with domain Cc∞(Ω)C_c^\infty(Ω) where the coefficients cij∈Wloc1,∞(Ωˉ)c_{ij}\in W^{1,\infty}_{\rm loc}(\barΩ) are real, cij=cjic_{ij}=c_{ji} and the coefficient matrix C=(cij)C=(c_{ij}) satisfies bounds 0<C(x)≤c(∣x∣)I0<C(x)\leq c(|x|) I for all x∈Ωx\in Ω. If ∫0∞ds sd/2 e−λ μ(s)2<∞ \int^\infty_0ds\,s^{d/2}\,e^{-λ\,μ(s)^2}<\infty for some λ>0λ>0 where μ(s)=∫0sdt c(t)−1/2μ(s)=\int^s_0dt\,c(t)^{-1/2} then we establish that HΩH_Ω is L1L_1-unique, i.e.\ it has a unique L1L_1-extension which generates a continuous semigroup, if and only if it is Markov unique, i.e.\ it has a unique L2L_2-extension which generates a submarkovian semigroup. Moreover these uniqueness conditions are equivalent with the capacity of the boundary of ΩΩ, measured with respect to HΩH_Ω, being zero. We also demonstrate that the capacity depends on two gross features, the Hausdorff dimension of subsets AA of the boundary the set and the order of degeneracy of HΩH_Ω at AA.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.