Paper detail

Kronecker classes, normal coverings and chief factors of groups

For a group $G$, a subgroup $U \leq G$ and a group $\mathrm{Inn}(G) \leq A \leq \mathrm{Aut}(G)$, we say that $U$ is an $A$-covering group of $G$ if $G = \bigcup_{a\in A}U^a$. A theorem of Jordan (1872) implies that if $G$ is a finite group, $A = \mathrm{Inn}(G)$ and $U$ is an $A$-covering group of $G$, then $U = G$. Motivated by a question concerning Kronecker classes of field extensions, Neumann and Praeger (1988) conjectured that, more generally, there is an integer function $f$ such that if $G$ is a finite group and $U$ is an $A$-covering subgroup of $G$, then $|G:U| \leq f(|A:\mathrm{Inn}(G)|)$. A key piece of evidence for this conjecture is a theorem of Praeger (1994), which asserts that there is a two-variable integer function $g$ such that if $G$ is a finite group and $U$ is an $A$-covering subgroup of $G$, then $|G:U|\leq g(|A:\mathrm{Inn}(G)|,c)$ where $c$ is the number of $A$-chief factors of~$G$. Unfortunately, the proof of this result contains an error. In this paper, using a different argument, we give a correct proof of this theorem.

preprint2024arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.