Paper detail

Kramers-Wannier Duality of Statistical Mechanics Applied to the Boolean Satisfiability Problem of Computer Science

We present a novel application of the Kramers-Wannier duality on one of the most important problems of computer science, the Boolean satisfiability problem (SAT). More specifically, we focus on sharp-SAT or equivalently #SAT - the problem of counting the number of solutions to a Boolean satisfaction formula. #SAT can be cast into a statistical-mechanical language, where it reduces to calculating the partition function of an Ising spin Hamiltonian with multi-spin interactions. We show that Kramers-Wannier duality can be generalized to apply to such multi-connected spin networks. We present an exact dual partner to #SAT and explicitly verify their equivalence with a few simple examples. It is shown that the NP-completeness of the original problem maps on the complexity of the dual problem of enumerating the number of non-negative solutions to a Diophantine system of equations. We discuss the implications of this duality and the prospects of similar dualities applied to computer science problems.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.