Paper detail

Kondo effect at low electron density and high particle-hole asymmetry in 1D, 2D, and 3D

Using the perturbative scaling and the NRG, we study the characteristic energy scales in the Kondo impurity problem as a function of the exchange coupling constant $J$ and the conduction electron density. We discuss the relation between the impurity binding energy $ΔE$ and the Kondo temperature $T_K$. We find that the two are proportional only for large values of $J$, whereas in the weak-coupling limit the energy gain is quadratic in $J$, while the Kondo temperature is exponentially small. The exact relation between the two quantities depends on the detailed form of the density of states of the band. In the limit of low electron density the Kondo screening is affected by the strong particle-hole asymmetry due to the presence of the band-edge van Hove singularities. We consider the cases of 1D, 2D, and 3D tight-binding lattices with inverse-square-root, step function, and square-root onsets of the density of states that are characteristic of the respective dimensionalities. We always find two different regimes depending on whether $T_K$ is higher or lower than $μ$, the chemical potential measured from the bottom of the band. For 2D and 3D, we find a sigmoidal cross-over between the large-$J$ and small-$J$ asymptotics in $ΔE$, and a clear separation between $ΔE$ and $T_K$ for $T_K < μ$. For 1D, there is in addition a sizable intermediate-$J$ regime where the Kondo temperature is quadratic in $J$ due to the diverging density of states at the band edge. Furthermore, we find that in 1D the particle-hole asymmetry leads to a large decrease of $T_K$ compared to the standard result obtained by approximating the density of states to be constant (flat-band approximation), while in 3D the opposite is the case; this is due to the non-trivial interplay of the exchange and potential scattering renormalization in the presence of particle-hole asymmetry.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.