Paper detail

Knot Theory for Proteins: Gauss Codes, Quandles and Bondles

Proteins are linear molecular chains that often fold to function. The topology of folding is widely believed to define its properties and function, and knot theory has been applied to study protein structure and its implications. More that 97% of proteins are, however, classified as unknots when intra-chain interactions are ignored. This raises the question as to whether knot theory can be extended to include intra-chain interactions and thus be able to categorize topology of the proteins that are otherwise classified as unknotted. Here, we develop knot theory for folded linear molecular chains and apply it to proteins. For this purpose, proteins will be thought of as an embedding of a linear segment into three dimensions, with additional structure coming from self-bonding. We then project to a two-dimensional diagram and consider the basic rules of equivalence between two diagrams. We further consider the representation of projections of proteins using Gauss codes, or strings of numbers and letters, and how we can equate these codes with changes allowed in the diagrams. Finally, we explore the possibility of applying the algebraic structure of quandles to distinguish the topologies of proteins. Because of the presence of bonds, we extend the theory to define bondles, a type of quandle particularly adapted to distinguishing the topological types of proteins.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.