Paper detail

Kinetics of Mycoprotein Production from Alternative Carbon Substrates

High throughput screening was used to study of the biokinetics of F. venenatum A3/5 cultivation on alternative carbon substrates, including monosaccharides, disaccharides and mixtures relevant to food & beverage, dairy and agricultural waste streams. Expired functional drink from the beverage sector was also assessed as the primary carbon source for mycoprotein production. Growth data was analysed using modified single and multiphase Gompertz models for comparison of maximum specific growth rate and progression milestones across diverse growth regimes. Time-series substrate and byproduct data was analysed using comparative metrics, providing an explanatory basis for the different growth phenotypes observed. Substrate type strongly influenced the apparent carbon allocation strategies, with rapidly consumed sugars such as glucose and sucrose supporting high growth rates, low biomass yield and a high degree of fermentative byproduct formation. Fructose and xylose cultivations led to slower overall growth but higher biomass yield and lower byproduct formation. Galactose and lactose showed distinct dynamics that suggested co-existence of transport and metabolic induction limitations. In all dual-substrate systems, sequential utilisation was observed. However, metabolic inheritance and environmental shift effects were highlighted as potential kinetic limitations. These conditions exhibited stunted diauxic growth and low yield from secondary sugars, with glucose-dominated primary growth significantly reshaping secondary substrate efficiencies relative to their study in silo. The expired functional drink supported highly rapid growth and achieved the highest maximum specific growth rate and biomass titre of all conditions examined, alongside reduced fermentative overflow and enhanced ethanol reassimilation relative to a compositionally matched synthetic control.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.