Paper detail

Kinetic theory of shear thickening for a moderately dense gas-solid suspension: from discontinuous thickening to continuous thickening

The Enskog kinetic theory for moderately dense gas-solid suspensions under simple shear flow is considered as a model to analyze the rheological properties of the system. The influence of the environmental fluid on solid particles is modeled via a viscous drag force plus a stochastic Langevin-like term. The Enskog equation is solved by means of two independent but complementary routes: (i) Grad's moment method and (ii) event-driven Langevin simulation of hard spheres. Both approaches clearly show that the flow curve (stress-strain rate relation) depends significantly on the volume fraction of the solid particles. In particular, as the density increases, there is a transition from the discontinuous shear thickening (observed in dilute gases) to the continuous shear thickening for denser systems. The comparison between theory and simulations indicate that while the theoretical predictions for the kinetic temperature agree well with simulations for densities $φ\lesssim 0.5$, the agreement for the other rheological quantities (the viscosity, the stress ratio and the normal stress differences) is limited to more moderate densities ($φ\lesssim 0.3$) if the inelasticity during collisions between particles is not large. [This paper has been published in Phys. Rev. E {\bf 96}, 42903 (2017) but we have realized that there are some typos and mistakes after its publication. So we add the Erratum which will be published in PRE in the top of this paper.]

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.