Paper detail

Kernel estimation of the instantaneous frequency

We consider kernel estimators of the instantaneous frequency of a slowly evolving sinusoid in white noise. The expected estimation error consists of two terms. The systematic bias error grows as the kernel halfwidth increases while the random error decreases. For a non-modulated signal, $g(t)$, the kernel halfwidth which minimizes the expected error scales as$h \sim \left[{ σ^2 \over N| \partial_t^2 g^{}|^2 } \right]^{1/ 5}$, where %$A^{(\ell)}$ is the coherent signal at frequency, $f_{\ell}$, $σ^2$ is the noise variance and $N$ is the number of measurements per unit time. We show that estimating the instantaneous frequency corresponds to estimating the first derivative of a modulated signal, $A(t)\exp(iϕ(t))$. For instantaneous frequency estimation, the halfwidth which minimizes the expected error is larger: $h_{1,3} \sim \left[{ σ^2 \over A^2N| \partial_t^3 (e^{i \tildeϕ(t)} )|^2 } \right]^{1/ 7}$. Since the optimal halfwidths depend on derivatives of the unknown function, we initially estimate these derivatives prior to estimating the actual signal.

preprint2018arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.