Paper detail

Kerman-Onishi conditions in self-consistent tilted-axis-cranking mean-field calculations

\item[Background] For cranked mean-field calculations with arbitrarily oriented rotational frequency vector $\boldsymbolω$ in the intrinsic frame, one has to employ constraints on average values of the quadrupole-moment tensor, so as to keep the nucleus in the principal-axis reference frame. Kerman and Onishi [Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 361}, 179 (1981)] have shown that the Lagrangian multipliers that correspond to the required constraints are proportional to $\boldsymbolω \times \boldsymbol{J}$, where $\boldsymbol{J}$ is the average angular momentum vector. \item[Purpose] We study the validity and consequences of the Kerman-Onishi conditions in the context of self-consistent tilted-axis-cranking (TAC) mean-field calculations. \item[Methods] We perform a two-dimensional self-consistent calculations (with and without pairing) utilizing the symmetry-unrestricted solver {\sc hfodd}. At each tilting angle, we compare the calculated values of quadrupole-moment-tensor Lagrangian multipliers and $\boldsymbolω \times \boldsymbol{J}$. \item[Results] We show that in self-consistent calculations, the Kerman-Onishi conditions are obeyed with high precision. Small deviations seen in the calculations with pairing can be attributed to the truncation of the quasiparticle spectrum. We also provide results of systematic TAC calculations for triaxial strongly deformed bands in $^{160}$Yb. \item[Conclusions] For non-stationary TAC solutions, Kerman-Onishi conditions link the non-zero values of the angle between rotational-frequency and angular-momentum vectors to the constraints on off-diagonal components of the quadrupole-moment tensor. To stabilize the convergence of self-consistent iterations, such constraints have to be taken into account. Only then one can determine the Routhian surfaces as functions of the tilting angles.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.