Paper detail

Kepler Binary Stars in NGC 6819 Open Cluster: KIC 5113146 and KIC 5111815

In this study, investigation of two double-lined binary stars KIC 5113146 and KIC 5111815 in NGC 6819 is presented based on both photometric and spectroscopic data. Simultaneous analysis of light and radial velocity curves was made and the absolute parameters of the systems' components were determined for the first time. We find that both systems have F-type main-sequence components. The masses and radii were found to be $M_1=1.29\pm0.02 M_{\odot}$, $R_{1}=1.47\pm0.03 R_{\odot}$ and $M_{2}=1.19\pm0.02 M_{\odot}$, $R_{2}=1.13\pm0.02 R_{\odot}$ for the primary and secondary components of KIC 5113146; $M_{1}=1.51\pm0.08 M_{\odot}$, $R_{1}=2.02\pm0.05 R_{\odot}$ and $M_{2}=1.19\pm0.07 M_{\odot}$, $R_{2}=1.32\pm0.04 R_{\odot}$ for components of KIC 5111815, respectively. Evolutionary status of the components was evaluated based on the MESA evolutionary tracks and isochrones. The ages of the KIC 5111815 and KIC 5113146 were derived to be about $2.50\pm0.35$ Gyr and $1.95\pm0.40$ Gyr, respectively. Photometric distances were calculated to be $2850\pm 185$ pc for KIC 5113146 and $3120\pm 260$ pc for KIC 5111815. The results obtained in this study, astrometric data and researches in the literature reveal that both KIC 5113146 and KIC 5111815 systems are the most likely member of NGC 6819.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.