Paper detail

Kekule versus hidden superconducting order in graphene-like systems: Competition and coexistence

We theoretically study the competition between two possible exotic superconducting orders that may occur in graphene-like systems, assuming dominant nearest-neighbor attraction: the gapless hidden superconducting order, which renormalizes the Fermi velocity, and the Kekule order, which opens a superconducting gap. We perform an analysis within the mean-field theory for Dirac electrons, at finite-temperature and finite chemical potential, as well as at half filling and zero-temperature, first excluding the possibility of the coexistence of the two orders. In that case, we find the dependence of the critical (more precisely, crossover) temperature and the critical interaction on the chemical potential. As a result of this analysis, we find that the Kekule order is preferred over the hidden order at both finite temperature and finite chemical potential. However, when the coexistence of the two superconducting orders is allowed, using the coupled mean-field gap equations, we find that above a critical value of the attractive interaction a mixed phase sets in, in which these orders coexist. We show that the critical value of the interaction for this transition is greater than the critical coupling for the hidden superconducting state in the absence of the Kekule order, implying that there is a region in the phase diagram where the Kekule order is favored as a result of the competition with the hidden superconducting order. The latter, however, eventually sets in and coexists with the Kekule state. According to our mean-field calculations, the transition from the Kekule to the mixed phase is of the second order, but it may become first order when fluctuations are considered. Finally, we investigate whether these phases could be possible in honeycomb superlattices of self-assembled semiconducting nanocrystals, which have been recently experimentally realized with CdSe and PbSe.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.