Paper detail

Kato perturbation expansion in classical mechanics and an explicit expression for a Deprit generator

This work explores the structure of Poincare-Lindstedt perturbation series in Deprit operator formalism and establishes its connection to Kato resolvent expansion. A discussion of invariant definitions for averaging and integrating perturbation operators and their canonical identities reveals a regular pattern in a Deprit generator. The pattern was explained using Kato series and the relation of perturbation operators to Laurent coefficients for the resolvent of Liouville operator. This purely canonical approach systematizes the series and leads to the explicit expression for the Deprit generator in any perturbation order: \[G = - \hat{\mathsf S}_H H_i.\] Here, $\hat{\mathsf S}_H$ is the partial pseudo-inverse of the perturbed Liouville operator. Corresponding Kato series provides a reasonably effective computational algorithm. The canonical connection of perturbed and unperturbed averaging operators allows for a description of ambiguities in the generator and transformed Hamiltonian, while Gustavson integrals turn out to be insensitive to normalization style. Non-perturbative examples are used for illustration.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.