Paper detail

$K^{*0}$ and $Σ^*$ production in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=$ 200 GeV and 62.4 GeV

Applying a quark combination model for the hadronization of Quark Gluon Plasma (QGP) and A Relativistic Transport (ART) model for the subsequent hadronic rescattering process, we investigate the production of $K^{*0}$ and $Σ^*$ resonances in central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=$ 200 GeV and 62.4 GeV. The initial $K^{*0}$ produced via hadronization is higher than the experimental data in the low $p_T$ region and is close to the data at 2-3 GeV/c. We take into account the hadronic rescattering effects which lead to a strong suppression of $K^{*0}$ with low $p_T$, and find that the $p_T$ spectrum of $K^{*0}$ can be well described. According to the suppressed magnitude of $K^{*0}$ yield, the time span of hadronic rescattering stage is estimated to be about 13 fm/c at 200 GeV and 5 fm/c at 62.4 GeV. The $p_T$ spectrum of $Σ^*$ directly obtained by quark combination hadronization in central Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV is in well agreement with the experimental data, which shows a weak hadronic rescattering effects. The elliptic flow v2 of $Σ^*$ in minimum bias Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV and $p_T$ spectrum of $Σ^*$ at lower 62.4 GeV are predicted.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.