Paper detail

JT gravity with matter, generalized ETH, and Random Matrices

We present evidence for a duality between Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity minimally coupled to a free massive scalar field and a single-trace two-matrix model. One matrix is the Hamiltonian $H$ of a holographic disorder-averaged quantum mechanics, while the other matrix is the light operator $\cal O$ dual to the bulk scalar field. The single-boundary observables of interest are thermal correlation functions of $\cal O$. We study the matching of the genus zero one- and two-boundary expectation values in the matrix model to the disk and cylinder Euclidean path integrals. The non-Gaussian statistics of the matrix elements of $\cal O$ correspond to a generalization of the ETH ansatz. We describe multiple ways to construct double-scaled matrix models that reproduce the gravitational disk correlators. One method involves imposing an operator equation obeyed by $H$ and $\cal O$ as a constraint on the two matrices. Separately, we design a model that reproduces certain double-scaled SYK correlators that may be scaled once more to obtain the disk correlators. We show that in any single-trace, two-matrix model, the genus zero two-boundary expectation value, with up to one $\cal O$ insertion on each boundary, can be computed directly from all of the genus zero one-boundary correlators. Applied to the models of interest, we find that these cylinder observables depend on the details of the double-scaling limit. To the extent we have checked, it is possible to reproduce the gravitational double-trumpet, which is UV divergent, from a systematic classification of matrix model `t Hooft diagrams. The UV divergence indicates that the matrix integral saddle of interest is perturbatively unstable. A non-perturbative treatment of the matrix models discussed in this work is left for future investigations.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.