Paper detail

Jordan Geometries - an Approach by Inversions

Jordan geometries are defined as spaces equipped with point reflections depending on triples of points, exchanging two of the points and fixing the third. In a similar way, symmetric spaces have been defined by Loos (Symmetric Spaces I, 1969) as spaces equipped with point reflections depending on a point and fixing this point; therefore the theories of Jordan geometries and of symmetric spaces are closely related to each other -- in order to describe this link, the notion of symmetry actions of torsors and of symmetric spaces is introduced. Jordan geometries give rise both to symmetry actions of certain abelian torsors and of certain symmetric spaces, which in a sense are dual to each other. By using an algebraic differential calculus generalizing the classical Weil functors (see arxiv:1402.2619), we attach a tangent object to such geometries, namely a Jordan pair, respectively a Jordan algebra. The present approach works equally well over base rings in which 2 is not invertible (and in particular over the integers), and hence can be seen as a globalization of quadratic Jordan pairs; it also has a very transparent relation with the theory of associative geometries developped by M. Kinyon and the author.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.