Paper detail

Jet substructure in $p$+$p$ and $p$+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\text{NN}}} = 200$ GeV at STAR

In order to attribute the partonic energy loss experienced by jets (jet quenching) observed in A+A collisions to the traversal of partons through the hot QCD medium, it is necessary to examine the cold nuclear matter (CNM) effects on the corresponding jets. Such an examination has historically been done using $p$+A collisions. We present fully corrected measurements of the jet mass and SoftDrop groomed jet mass in $p$+$p$ and $p$+Au collisions at STAR at $\sqrt{s_{\rm{NN}}}=200$ GeV as a function of the event activity (EA) to increase or decrease the magnitude of CNM effects. EA is determined in the backward (Au-going) rapidity ($-5.0<η<-3.3$) by the STAR Beam-Beam Counter to minimize auto-correlation with jets measured at mid-rapidity. Comparison of the jet mass distribution in $p$+Au collisions to that in $p$+$p$ collisions allows for isolation of CNM effects in anticipation of an upcoming jet mass measurement in Au+Au collisions.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.