Paper detail

$J/ψ$ production and elliptic flow in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

Using a two-component model for charmonium production, which includes contributions from both the initial hard nucleon-nucleon scattering and from the regeneration in the quark-gluon plasma, we study the nuclear modification factor $R_{AA}$ and elliptic flow $v_2$ of $J/ψ$ in relativistic heavy ion collisions. For the expansion dynamics of produced hot dense matter, we introduce a schematic fireball model with its transverse acceleration determined from the pressure gradient inside the fireball and azimuthally anisotropic expansion parameterized to reproduce measured $v_2$ of light hadrons. We assume that light hadrons freeze out at the temperature of 120 MeV while charmonia at 160 MeV, similar to the kinetic and chemical freeze-out temperatures in the statistical model, respectively. For the properties of charmonia in the quark-gluon plasma, we use the screening mass between their charm and anticharm quarks and their dissociation cross sections given by the perturbative QCD (pQCD) in the leading order and up to the next-to-leading order, respectively. For the relaxation time of charm and anticharm quarks in the quark-gluon plasma, we also use the one calculated in the leading order of pQCD. Modeling the effect of higher-order corrections in pQCD by introducing multiplicative factors to the dissociation cross section of charmonia and the elastic scattering cross sections of charm and anticharm quarks, we find that this effect is small for the $R_{AA}$ of $J/ψ$ as they suppress the number of initially produced $J/ψ$ but enhance the number of regenerated ones. The higher-order corrections increase, however, the $v_2$ of $J/ψ$. Our results suggest that the $v_2$ of $J/ψ$ can play an important role in discriminating between $J/ψ$ production from the initial hard collisions and from the regeneration in the quark-gluon plasma.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.