Paper detail

Iterative training of robust k-space interpolation networks for improved image reconstruction with limited scan specific training samples

Purpose: To evaluate an iterative learning approach for enhanced performance of Robust Artificial-neural-networks for K-space Interpolation (RAKI), when only a limited amount of training data (auto-calibration signals, ACS) are available for accelerated standard 2D imaging. Methods: In a first step, the RAKI model was optimized for the case of strongly limited training data amount. In the iterative learning approach (termed iterative RAKI), the optimized RAKI model is initially trained using original and augmented ACS obtained from a linear parallel imaging reconstruction. Subsequently, the RAKI convolution filters are refined iteratively using original and augmented ACS extracted from the previous RAKI reconstruction. Evaluation was carried out on 200 retrospectively undersampled in-vivo datasets from the fastMRI neuro database with different contrast settings. Results: For limited training data (18 and 22 ACS lines for R=4 and R=5, respectively), iterative RAKI outperforms standard RAKI by reducing residual artefacts and yields strong noise suppression when compared to standard parallel imaging, underlined by quantitative reconstruction quality metrics. In combination with a phase constraint, further reconstruction improvements can be achieved. Additionally, iterative RAKI shows better performance than both GRAPPA and RAKI in case of pre-scan calibration with varying contrast between training- and undersampled data. Conclusion: The iterative learning approach with RAKI benefits from standard RAKIs well known noise suppression feature but requires less original training data for the accurate reconstruction of standard 2D images thereby improving net acceleration.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.