Paper detail

Iterative procedure for network inference

When a network is reconstructed from data, two types of errors can occur: false positive and false negative errors about the presence or absence of links. In this paper, the vertex degree distribution of the true underlying network is analytically reconstructed using an iterative procedure. Such procedure is based on the inferred network and estimates for the probabilities $α$ and $β$ of type I and type II errors, respectively. The iteration procedure consists of choosing various values for $α$ to perform the iteration steps of the network reconstruction. For the first step, the standard value for $α$ of 0.05 can be chosen as an example. The result of this first step gives a first estimate of the network topology of interest. For the second iteration step the value for $α$ is adjusted according to the findings of the first step. This procedure is iterated, ultimately leading to a reconstruction of the vertex degree distribution tailored to its previously unknown network topology.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.