Researcher profile

Gloria Cecchini

Gloria Cecchini contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Latency correction in sparse neuronal spike trains

Background: In neurophysiological data, latency refers to a global shift of spikes from one spike train to the next, either caused by response onset fluctuations or by finite propagation speed. Such systematic shifts in spike timing lead to a spurious decrease in synchrony which needs to be corrected. New Method: We propose a new algorithm of multivariate latency correction suitable for sparse data for which the relevant information is not primarily in the rate but in the timing of each individual spike. The algorithm is designed to correct systematic delays while maintaining all other kinds of noisy disturbances. It consists of two steps, spike matching and distance minimization between the matched spikes using simulated annealing. Results: We show its effectiveness on simulated and real data: cortical propagation patterns recorded via calcium imaging from mice before and after stroke. Using simulations of these data we also establish criteria that can be evaluated beforehand in order to anticipate whether our algorithm is likely to yield a considerable improvement for a given dataset. Comparison with Existing Method(s): Existing methods of latency correction rely on adjusting peaks in rate profiles, an approach that is not feasible for spike trains with low firing in which the timing of individual spikes contains essential information. Conclusions: For any given dataset the criterion for applicability of the algorithm can be evaluated quickly and in case of a positive outcome the latency correction can be applied easily since the source codes of the algorithm are publicly available.

preprint2020arXiv

Impact of network characteristics on network reconstruction

When a network is inferred from data, two types of errors can occur: false positive and false negative conclusions about the presence of links. We focus on the influence of local network characteristics on the probability $α$ - of type I false positive conclusions, and on the probability $β$ - of type II false negative conclusions, in the case of networks of coupled oscillators. We demonstrate that false conclusion probabilities are influenced by local connectivity measures such as the shortest path length and the detour degree, which can also be estimated from the inferred network when the true underlying network is not known a priory. These measures can then be used for quantification of the confidence level of link conclusions, and for improving the network reconstruction via advanced concepts of link thresholding.

preprint2020arXiv

Iterative procedure for network inference

When a network is reconstructed from data, two types of errors can occur: false positive and false negative errors about the presence or absence of links. In this paper, the vertex degree distribution of the true underlying network is analytically reconstructed using an iterative procedure. Such procedure is based on the inferred network and estimates for the probabilities $α$ and $β$ of type I and type II errors, respectively. The iteration procedure consists of choosing various values for $α$ to perform the iteration steps of the network reconstruction. For the first step, the standard value for $α$ of 0.05 can be chosen as an example. The result of this first step gives a first estimate of the network topology of interest. For the second iteration step the value for $α$ is adjusted according to the findings of the first step. This procedure is iterated, ultimately leading to a reconstruction of the vertex degree distribution tailored to its previously unknown network topology.