Paper detail

Iterative hypothesis testing for multi-object tracking in presence of features with variable reliability

This paper assumes prior detections of multiple targets at each time instant, and uses a graph-based approach to connect those detections across time, based on their position and appearance estimates. In contrast to most earlier works in the field, our framework has been designed to exploit the appearance features, even when they are only sporadically available, or affected by a non-stationary noise, along the sequence of detections. This is done by implementing an iterative hypothesis testing strategy to progressively aggregate the detections into short trajectories, named tracklets. Specifically, each iteration considers a node, named key-node, and investigates how to link this key-node with other nodes in its neighborhood, under the assumption that the target appearance is defined by the key-node appearance estimate. This is done through shortest path computation in a temporal neighborhood of the key-node. The approach is conservative in that it only aggregates the shortest paths that are sufficiently better compared to alternative paths. It is also multi-scale in that the size of the investigated neighborhood is increased proportionally to the number of detections already aggregated into the key-node. The multi-scale nature of the process and the progressive relaxation of its conservativeness makes it both computationally efficient and effective. Experimental validations are performed extensively on a toy example, a 15 minutes long multi-view basketball dataset, and other monocular pedestrian datasets.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.