Paper detail

Iterative ensemble smoother as an approximate solution to a regularized minimum-average-cost problem: theory and applications

The focus of this work is on an alternative implementation of the iterative ensemble smoother (iES). We show that iteration formulae similar to those used in \cite{chen2013-levenberg,emerick2012ensemble} can be derived by adopting a regularized Levenberg-Marquardt (RLM) algorithm \cite{jin2010regularized} to approximately solve a minimum-average-cost (MAC) problem. This not only leads to an alternative theoretical tool in understanding and analyzing the behaviour of the aforementioned iES, but also provides insights and guidelines for further developments of the smoothing algorithms. For illustration, we compare the performance of an implementation of the RLM-MAC algorithm to that of the approximate iES used in \cite{chen2013-levenberg} in three numerical examples: an initial condition estimation problem in a strongly nonlinear system, a facies estimation problem in a 2D reservoir and the history matching problem in the Brugge field case. In these three specific cases, the RLM-MAC algorithm exhibits comparable or even better performance, especially in the strongly nonlinear system.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.