Paper detail

Isotonic Regression in Multi-Dimensional Spaces and Graphs

In this paper we study minimax and adaptation rates in general isotonic regression. For uniform deterministic and random designs in $[0,1]^d$ with $d\ge 2$ and $N(0,1)$ noise, the minimax rate for the $\ell_2$ risk is known to be bounded from below by $n^{-1/d}$ when the unknown mean function $f$ is nondecreasing and its range is bounded by a constant, while the least squares estimator (LSE) is known to nearly achieve the minimax rate up to a factor $(\log n)^γ$ where $n$ is sample size, $γ= 4$ in the lattice design and $γ= \max\{9/2, (d^2+d+1)/2 \}$ in the random design. Moreover, the LSE is known to achieve the adaptation rate $(K/n)^{-2/d}\{1\vee \log(n/K)\}^{2γ}$ when $f$ is piecewise constant on $K$ hyperrectangles in a partition of $[0,1]^d$. Due to the minimax theorem, the LSE is identical on every design point to both the max-min and min-max estimators over all upper and lower sets containing the design point. This motivates our consideration of estimators which lie in-between the max-min and min-max estimators over possibly smaller classes of upper and lower sets, including a subclass of block estimators. Under a $q$-th moment condition on the noise, we develop $\ell_q$ risk bounds for such general estimators for isotonic regression on graphs. For uniform deterministic and random designs in $[0,1]^d$ with $d\ge 3$, our $\ell_2$ risk bound for the block estimator matches the minimax rate $n^{-1/d}$ when the range of $f$ is bounded and achieves the near parametric adaptation rate $(K/n)\{1\vee\log(n/K)\}^{d}$ when $f$ is $K$-piecewise constant. Furthermore, the block estimator possesses the following oracle property in variable selection: When $f$ depends on only a subset $S$ of variables, the $\ell_2$ risk of the block estimator automatically achieves up to a poly-logarithmic factor the minimax rate based on the oracular knowledge of $S$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.