Paper detail

Isospin-density dependent pairing from infinite nuclear matter to finite nuclei

The effective isospin-density dependent pairing interaction (P1) [S. S. Zhang, U. Lombardo and E. G. Zhao, Sci. Chin. Phys. Mech. Astro. {\bf 54}, 236 (2011)] extracted from neutron pairing gaps for $^1$S$_0$ in asymmetric nuclear matter calculations [S. S. Zhang, L. G. Cao, U. Lombardo, et al. Phys. Rev. C {\bf 81}, 044313 (2010)] is employed to study the bulk properties of Ca, Ni, Zr and Sn isotopes. The odd-even mass (OEM) staggering is calculated by the Skyrme Hartree-Fock plus BCS method (SHF + BCS) with the SkP interaction. For comparison, we study two other types of isovector effective pairing interactions. One is also extracted from pairing gaps of infinite nuclear matter by the Brueckner-Hartree-Fock (BHF) method but for free spectrum (P2). The other is obtained by fitting the empirical OEM (P3). An isoscalar effective pairing interaction (P4) is also adopted which is determined by fitting the empirical OEM. We find that interaction P1 can better describe the OEM staggering of Ni, Zr and Sn isotopes by $14.3 \%, 41 \%, 30.4 \%$ compared with interaction P2, in terms of root mean square deviations to the empirical OEM, respectively. On the other hand, the performance of P1 and P2 is comparable for Ca isotopes. For Ca and Ni isotopes, P1 behaves similarly as P3, but for Zr isotopes P1 is better than P3 by $\sim 34 \%$. Among the four pairing interactions studied, P4 performs the worst. Therefore, one may conclude that for neutron pairings in finite nuclei, the isovector pairings are preferred than the isoscalar one. It is quite interesting to note that the pairing interaction P1 extracted from nuclear matter calculations can describe pairing gaps of finite nuclei as well as or even better than the interaction P3 directly fitted to finite nuclei.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.