Paper detail

Isobaric Yield Ratio Difference in Heavy-ion Collisions, and Comparison to Isoscaling

An isobaric yield ratio difference (IBD) method is proposed to study the ratio of the difference between the chemical potential of neutron and proton to temperature ($Δμ/T$) in heavy-ion collisions. The $Δμ/T$ determined by the IBD method (IB-$Δμ/T$) is compared to the results of the isoscaling method (IS-$Δμ/T$), which uses the isotopic or the isotonic yield ratio. Similar distributions of the IB- and IS-$Δμ/T$ are found in the measured 140$A$ MeV $^{40,48}$Ca + $^{9}$Be and the $^{58,64}$Ni + $^{9}$Be reactions. The IB- and IS-$Δμ/T$ both have a distribution with a plateau in the small mass fragments plus an increasing part in the fragments of relatively larger mass. The IB- and IS-$Δμ/T$ plateaus show dependence on the $n/p$ ratio of the projectile. It is suggested that the height of the plateau is decided by the difference between the neutron density ($ρ_n$) and the proton density ($ρ_p$) distributions of the projectiles, and the width shows the overlapping volume of the projectiles in which $ρ_n$ and $ρ_p$ change very little. The difference between the IB- and IS-$Δμ/T$ is explained by the isoscaling parameters being constrained by the many isotopes and isotones, while the IBD method only uses the yields of two isobars. It is suggested that the IB-$Δμ/T$ is more reasonable than the IS-$Δμ/T$, especially when the isotopic or isotonic ratio disobeys the isoscaling. As to the question whether the $Δμ/T$ depends on the density or the temperature, the density dependence is preferred since the low density can result in low temperature in the peripheral reactions.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.