Paper detail

Is the Tsallis q-mean value instable?

The recent argue about the existence of an instability in the definition of the mean value appearing in the Tsallis non extensive Statistical Mechanic is reconsidered. Here, it is simply underlined that the pair of probability distributions employed in constructing the instability statement have a discontinuous limit when the number of states tends to infinity. That is, although for an arbitrary but finite number of states W, both probability distributions are normalized to the unit, their limits W tending to infinity do not satisfy the normalization condition and thus are not allowed "escort" probabilities for the q-mean value. However, similar distributions converging to the former ones when a parameter W_o is tending to infinity are defined here. They both satisfy the normalization to the unity in the limit W tending to infinity. This simple change allows to show that the stability condition becomes satisfied, for whatever large but fixed value of W_o is chosen.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.