Paper detail

Is nonstandard interaction a solution to the three neutrino tensions?

In this work we present a scenario in which a nonstandard interaction in neutrino propagation can explain the three major tensions in the neutrino oscillation data at present. These tensions are: (i) a non-zero best-fit value of the non-standard oscillation parameters in the the global analysis of the solar and KamLAND data which rules out the standard oscillation scenario at $90\%$ C.L, (ii) the measurement of the non-maximal value of $θ_{23}$ by NO$ν$A which excludes the maximal mixing at $2.5 σ$ C.L. and (iii) a discrepancy in the $θ_{13}$ measurement by T2K which has a tension with the reactor best-fit value of $\sin^2θ_{13}=0.021$ at $90\%$ C.L. Our results show that all these three above mentioned anomalies can be explained if one assumes the existence of the non-standard interactions in neutrino propagation with $θ_{23}=45^\circ$ and $\sin^2θ_{13}=0.021$ in the case of normal hierarchy. In our scenario the phase of $ε_{eτ}$ is zero and the most favorable value of the Dirac CP phase is approximately $255^\circ$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.